Australasian Society for Trenchless Technology
Library
Corporate membersNewsEvents
ASTT

Library

Browse the libraryTechniques A–ZAsk ASTTCorporate membersNewsEvents

ASTT

About ASTTCouncilMembershipStrategic PlanFAQContact
ASTT — Australasian Society for Trenchless Technology

The Australasian Society for Trenchless Technology — the peak industry body for trenchless engineering across Australia and New Zealand.

Regional affiliate of the ISTT

PO Box 2242, Malaga LPO WA 6944, Australia

+61 (0) 419 918 449

secretary@astt.com.au

Explore

  • Knowledge library
  • Ask ASTT
  • Corporate members
  • News
  • Events

ASTT

  • About
  • Council
  • Contact
  • Help
  • ISTT
  • Cookie preferences
© 2026 Australasian Society for Trenchless TechnologyDeveloped byEventMagix
  1. Home
  2. /Knowledge library
  3. /Comparison of AI with Optimized QC vs Human Condition Assessment of Sanitary Sewers in Boston, MA
Library
MembersPaper2025

Comparison of AI with Optimized QC vs Human Condition Assessment of Sanitary Sewers in Boston, MA

Purnima Praturi, Ryan J. Graham

Abstract

The Boston Water and Sewer Commission (BWSC) collects 10-miles (16 kilometers) of closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspection videos per year. These inspections are performed by a combination of in-house staff and contracted resources. Manual coding of CCTV inspections by different resources can be subjective. To address this, in-house engineering staff review inspection videos to confirm the identified reportable observations and to develop action plans when needed. To gain a better insight into the subjective nature of manually coded reportable observations, a side-by-side comparison was completed to quantify differences between manually coded reportable observations and those identified using artificial intelligence (AI) software (DragonflySM) plus optimized quality control (QC) review. Optimized QC review was performed to ensure that AI coding was meeting high quality National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) Pipeline Assessment Certification Program (PACP) output. The side-by-side comparison included a sample size of 20 pipe segments totaling approximately 4,000 linear feet (1,219 linear meters) of varying pipe materials, shapes, diameters, age, and condition. Results from the comparison showed that AI software with optimized QC review offered a consistent and accurate alternative to manually reviewed CCTV inspections and was able to correctly identify reportable observations by human inspectors, while also identifying major and nuanced reportable observations (e.g., cracks and fine roots) that may have been overlooked or disregarded by human inspectors. The comparison demonstrated how AI with optimized QC review of CCTV pipeline inspections can provide more consistent pipeline condition grading of both structural and maintenance defects, which can affect the prioritization of linear assets requiring prompt intervention. This presentation on leveraging AI for visual detection and recognition of reportable defects for pipeline inspections, and the importance of utilizing an optimized QC process to rapidly verify AI outputs, will assist utilities with streamlining operational procedures, allocation of resources, and capital planning.

Full paper available to ASTT members

The abstract above is open to everyone. Sign in with your ASTT membership email to open the full PDF.

Sign inAbout membership

Citation

Purnima Praturi, Ryan J. Graham (2025). Comparison of AI with Optimized QC vs Human Condition Assessment of Sanitary Sewers in Boston, MA. International No-Dig 2025 Vancouver. ASTT Knowledge Library.

Sector

water

Details

Source:
International No-Dig 2025 Vancouver
Pages:
14
File:
PDF, 1.3 MB

One-page brief